Tag Archives: Market

Market Analysis

Best Anti Wrinkle Cream on The Market

Leave a comment

Lifecell is the best anti wrinkle cream on the market which is highly recommended by top dermatologists. It is rated as the most effective needle-free treatment which is in existence by dermatologists. Research which was carried out by dermatologists revealed that it combats cell impairment caused by wrinkles and aging. Lifecell passed through human testing for some months before it was proven, thus it result is not based on animal testing. It will surprise you to know that middle-aged fashion models make use of lifecell cream to get rid of their wrinkles. This is among the reason why they are normally accused of being under-age.

The results from the use of lifecell do not take a long time to begin to surface. In as little as 60 seconds after the application of this wrinkle cream, you will begin to see its effect. This cream is a great alternative to costly botox injection and face-lifting. These are invasive methods that require money and there are complications which may occur in the process of using it. Lifecell is an all-natural product which contains potent ingredients from nature. It is these natural ingredients used for its production that will eliminate the signs of aging while getting rid of your wrinkles.

It combats all forms of aging problem like fine line, wrinkles, sagging skin, under-eye dark circles and puffiness, age-spots and feather lip. These are some of the signs of aging that affects the face which be taken care of using lifecell. The before and after pictures of lifecell displayed across the web will convince you better that it truly works.

Market Analysis

Find The Best Guaranteed Annuity Rates Using The Open Market Option

1 Comment

Guaranteed annuity rates are the most popular form of annuities and can be found using the open market option. The open market option was introduced to let retirees find guaranteed annuity rates from the entire market avoiding being forced to purchase the rates from the pension company they had saved with.

There are many different types of annuity that can be purchased at retirement, but by far the most popular is the guaranteed annuity, this is because of the guarantee that the income cannot fall during the life of the retiree. Those in retirement require certainty of income and do not want to worry about watching their annuity rates. Of course because the rates on guaranteed annuities are fixed there is no scope for income increases during retirement, meaning the longer you live inflation could eat into the buying power of the income.

Just because the name guaranteed annuity sounds as though the income cannot increase does not mean you cannot have escalating income, you can purchase an option for your guaranteed annuity to increase each year either by a fixed percentage or by the retail price index, this will mean the starting income would be lower than a guaranteed annuity without the options.

There are other options you can purchase when you buy guaranteed annuity rates, one of the most important and popular options is the continuing pension for spouse or partner, this means in the event of your death the pension can continue. The pension can continue at a percentage of the pension or a the full rate, again the starting income is lower and the more you wish to be paid as a continuing pension the lower the starting income of the guaranteed annuity. Other options that can be purchased at the same time are a guaranteed payment period and value protection, which pay out a amount to protect you if you die in the early years of retirement.

Market Analysis

Different Markets Working in Stock Market

Leave a comment

Section One discussed some of the considerations involved in deciding whether to specialize in one stock market or to trade a diversified portfolio of markets. Proper diversification can go a long way towards reducing your risk of ruin. It is a commonly known fact that some markets trade similarly Others do not. The extent to which two different markets trade similarly is referred to as their “correlation.” A statistical function known as the “correlation coefficient “can tell you how closely the price fluctuations of two markets mirror one another. Two markets that trade exactly the same would have a correlation coefficient of 1.On the other end of the spectrum; two markets that trade exactly the opposite would have a correlation coefficient of -1. Markets whose price movements have no correlation whatsoever would have a correlation coefficient of 0. Alack of correlation between markets offers an opportunity for astute traders to minimize the fluctuations of the equity in their account.

Let’s illustrate this by looking at two different portfolios. Consider a portfolio trading T-Bonds, 10-Year T-Notes and 5-Year T-Notes using the same approach. Each of these contracts fluctuates based upon changes in interest rates. These contracts will generally rise or fall together with the main difference being the magnitude of their price movement. If you are trading them all using the same approach it is likely that at times you will be long all three contracts or short all three contracts. If interest rates are generally rising, each of these contracts will likely fall in price. If interest rates are falling, each of these contracts will likely rise in price. As a result, when you are on the right side of the market you will certainly score some big gains. However, if you are long all three contracts and interest rates spike higher you will likely take a significant hit. You may achieve good profits trading this portfolio, but in terms of risk control the thing to recognize is that you will almost certainly experience some sharp swings in account equity. If these swings are more than you can handle you may be forced to stop trading before reaping the full benefit of your approach.

Now consider an account trading a portfolio of T-Bonds, Natural Gas and the Japanese Yen. These markets fluctuate based on different variables. If you are trading them all using the same approach there is no inherent reason to expect them to trade in a similar manner. At times they may all rise or fall in unison, but more often than not they will be rising and falling independently from one another. Also, there may be periods when two of the three markets will be trading in a narrow range and offering few profitable trends. At the same time the third market may be trending strongly, thereby giving a trader the opportunity to make enough money trading that contract to offset his losses in the other two contracts.

The equity curves for these two portfolios using a particular system are shown in Figures 3-1 and 3-2. Note that the portfolio trading just the three interest rate contracts actually made more money over a four and a quarter year test period than the diversified portfolio. In retrospect, a person could say that this was the “better” portfolio because it made more money. But take a close look at the relative choppiness of these two equity curves. Whereas the interest rate only portfolio had a number of sharp drawdown’s and some drawn out flat periods, the diversified portfolio for the most part crept steadily higher throughout. Most traders would have a far easier time sticking to a trading program trading the diversified portfolio in this example, even though it earned less profit.

Market Analysis

Evolution of The Commodity Trading Market

Leave a comment

The primary reason why commodity trading market has evolved is because there was a desperate need to make sure that there was a continuous supply of agricultural crop that was seasonal. Japanese merchants were known to store their warehouses with rice in particular so that they could use it in future. So that they could have a raised cash warehouse holder for the rice that was stored! The rice was also known as the rice ticket that later turned to be a general commercial currency that also helped in the standardization of the commodity trading in rice.

19th century Chicago was where the commodity trading concept came about and Chicago itself eventually turned to be a huge hub for the telegraph and the rice road. After noticing the benefits of commodity trading farmers and dealers too began getting into a commodity trading contract. The farmers and traders would enter into contracts that would help the farmer sell a particular produce (rice) at a future date at a price that was already agreed upon. As a result this kind of contract between farmers and dealers etc rose to popularity, and every farmer and dealer got into this kind of arrangement. However it grew so popular that the produce changed hands through contracts even before that particular produce was delivered. However this was a great risk, especially if the produce was not as expected or anticipated. The farmers found a way though this as well, and in case of adversity they would make arrangements that the produce was delivered though another farmer, however there would be slight modification to the contract. Over a period of time the contract was modified into a kind of instrument that would protect parties who faced adverse factors like damage to crops, unfavorable climate condition, and unexpected rise in price. This called for traders to enter into the future commodity trading markets who had no intention of buying or selling wheat or any other produce. They however formed a body that would help regulate rules and keep a strict supervision over the contracts.

After this the CBOT also known as the Chicago Board of Trade was established in 1848. Chicago was chosen since it was considered to be a common place where sellers and buyers could meet, negotiate and then move forward with the contacts. Later on similar regulatory bodies for other products like the USA Chicago board or trade and Chicago merchant exchange, Sugar and Cocoa exchange worldwide, The New York commodity trading exchange and New York Coffee etc were established.

Market Analysis

Market Research Report Provides Best Practices For Authoring in Global Communications

Leave a comment

The process of global content creation is complex. Content source optimization requires the author be clear and concise, use correct terminology, avoid national or cultural references in verbal or graphical imagery, and comply with international style guides. Market research firm Common Sense Advisory surveyed and interviewed dozens of global product manufacturers on their authoring technologies, processes, and tools for its authoring best practices research report, “Content Source Optimization.”

The report highlights organizational change, process improvements, and technology solutions among advanced global content producers, many of whom employ more than 50 authors on internal teams. Leading practitioners have begun to adopt tools for source optimization, including terminology development and style guide checkers (used by 30% of respondents). Fewer companies systematize multilingual terminology management (13%); “authoring memory” software is used in only 17% of the advanced authoring environments examined. Common Sense Advisory found that glaring gaps still exist in the software solutions due the early stage of market development, but also stemming in part from confused goals and inadequate planning among information producers.

Comments report lead analyst, Ben Sargent, “Tools that help content creators do better work, increase efficiency, and collaborate across regions, languages, and corporate functions are badly needed. But to succeed, the organizational and process barriers between technical authoring, marketing, and translation must be broken down.”

The findings from the research show that quality and price are key drivers for content source optimization:

* Companies seeking to reduce the cost of customer support were 14 times more likely to favor technology implementation over other approaches.

* To reduce cost of translation, information producers were four times more likely to favor training and professional development over other approaches.

* To improve the quality and consistency of translated content companies flagged technology, process re-engineering, and training in nearly equal measure, indicating that no single approach gets the intended results.

But improving quality and reducing cost were not the only factors driving change. To increase agility and reduce time-to-market, companies may reform various parts of the global content creation process. For example, firms addressing markets across the European Union expand to as many as 23 languages. If their plans include Russia, Turkey, the Middle East, and East Asia, the tally quickly climbs to 35 or 40 (see “The Top 40 Global Online Brands,” Nov09). That means dozens of streams of information depend on the quality and accuracy of the original materials.

To tackle the challenges of global content creation, Common Sense Advisory recommends a six-step process:

Step 1: Find a Content Optimization Champion
Step 2: Trace “the secret life of shared words” (to map content transformations)
Step 3: Align organizational goals across multiple functions within the enterprise
Step 4: Assemble and prioritize business needs for global communications
Step 5: Determine success factors for measurement of information quality, cost, and time-to-market
Step 6: Plan the implementation (often a multi-year process)

Adds Sargent: “These six steps will go a long way toward addressing the current chaotic state of content development and translation; improving a company’s ability to forecast and direct the flow of information through an organization. But technology vendors must help information producers to bridge process gaps by unifying terminology and style guide definition and enforcement across source and target language content creation processes.”